THE TUG-OF-WAR between Scotland and Wales for Steve Shingler has highlighted serious flaws in rugby’s eligibility regulations. As it stands Shingler cannot play for Scotland in the Six Nations despite being selected in Andy Robinson’s squad because he represented Wales at U20 level against France last season. As both U20 teams were deemed their country’s second team it meant Shingler had aligned himself solely to Wales at Test level.
The WRU say Shingler was aware of this, but he was obviously confused about the issue or he wouldn’t have said yes to Scotland’s advances. In fact, London Irish signed him believing he was eligible for Wales, Scotland and England! Now Scotland have taken the case to the IRB’s regulations committee but if they rule in Wales’ favour Shingler’s Test career could be over before it’s started. He won’t be able to play for the Scots while he’s probably surplus to Wales’ requirements right now. If he ever does represent Wales at senior level he’ll also have to win over the fans after this controversy.
London Irish director of rugby Toby Booth is hoping common sense will prevail and that Shingler will play for Scotland, saying that the fly-half/centre simply wants to play international rugby. It’s not a great situation for the 20-year-old to find himself in – though his decision to take part in an advert for Wales last year looks rather ill-advised at the moment – and the IRB should step in to ensure it doesn’t happen to others.
So what’s the solution? I’d suggest making a country’s U20 team the same as a sevens or A team across the board so anyone who plays at that level is eligible only for that nation in the future. This makes the situation far clearer because any game at that level would qualify you for that one country.
If a player is eligible for several countries, like Shingler, and wants to keep his options open, then he can always turn down the opportunity to play age-group rugby. A lot of players still play Test rugby without having played any representative rugby and, besides, more experience of senior club rugby could actually be more beneficial.
While we’re at it, I’d also extend the residency qualification from three years to five. That way players have to show a real commitment to their chosen country and it will stop older southern hemisphere players heading North in their late twenties when they’ve failed to make a Tri-Nations squad and thinking they’ll find it easier to be selected for a home nation. The northern hemisphere should back its own talent anyway and not put a player on a pedestal simply because he’s from New Zealand or South Africa.
Playing international rugby is an honour that players should appreciate – switching allegiances willy-nilly tarnishes that idea. Yes, rugby’s a professional sport, but we should cherish the traditional values of pride and passion, especially at Test level.
